Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $89.99 vs $328.95
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700K - $0.70 vs $2.03 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105T - 162 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 28 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
129
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6884 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
34%
Price, $
$328.95
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $328.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6884 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |