The Core i3-10105F is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7302 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $779.96 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 93% cheaper – $59.99 vs $839.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 65 vs 155 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7302
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7302 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7302 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7302 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Comet Lake-R | Codename | Rome |
65 W | Power Consumption | 155 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
