EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-14900KS in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900KS and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $490.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
The Core i9-14900KS is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-14900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 58% cheaper – $349.95 vs $839.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 150 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
247
100%
Min 1% FPS
168
100%
Price, $
$349.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-14900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-14900KS in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
53%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KS |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $689.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
155 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |