The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10920X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $42.69 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10920X
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 5% cheaper – $797.26 vs $839.95
- A better value for money for gaming
EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-10920X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, $
$797.26
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
75%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Rome | Codename | Cascade Lake-X |
155 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
