Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-14900KS in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-10105F is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900KS, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $304.89 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- Up to 87% cheaper – $45.06 vs $349.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-14900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
83%
Min 1% FPS
139
83%
Price, $
$45.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
247
100%
Min 1% FPS
168
100%
Price, $
$349.95
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-14900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-14900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2024 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $689.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
