Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 315 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10105F - 143 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $76.80 vs $86.30
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10105F - $0.54 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 58 vs 65 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $86.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7260 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7261 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |