Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $86.30 vs $110.61
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-12400F - $0.36 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-10105F - 266 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
86%
Price, $
$110.61
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |