The Core i3-10105F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $113.94 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 72% cheaper – $45.06 vs $159.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3210
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$45.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Comet Lake-R | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
