Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 166 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - 56 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $176.0 vs $680.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $3.26 vs $12.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.14/FPS
26.853377265238876%
Price, $
$680
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $680 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
96.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$3.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$176
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $176 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
90.20242914979757%
Multi-Core
5489
74.10557580666936%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Colfax | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |