Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 150 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G4900 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $23.31 vs $1075.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.12 vs $5.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.66/FPS
2%
Price, $
$1075
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $23.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |