Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dishonored 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 270 vs 264 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $115.59 vs $692.1
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.43 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $692.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |