Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4790S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1187 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4790S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-4790S - $270.0 vs $274.5
- Up to 2% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-4790S - $1.36 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790S - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for $274.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-4790S |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |