Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $270.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-13400F - $1.0 vs $3.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 287 vs 271 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
31%
Price, $
$899.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |