Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Saints Row than Core i3-10320 - 186 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $139.99 vs $689.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Saints Row than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.85 vs $3.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.71/FPS
23%
Price, $
$689.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $689.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |