Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10320 - 164 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $120.0 vs $378.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-14700KF - $0.92 vs $2.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
39%
Price, $
$378.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $378.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12431 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |