Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10320 - 263 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $139.99 vs $519.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.57 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
29%
Price, $
$519.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $519.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |