Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-8320 - 248 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $102.02 vs $689.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.5 vs $2.78 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.78/FPS
18%
Price, $
$689.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $689.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |