Buy on Amazon
$130
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $140
Availability
MSRP in USD: $140
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than FX-8320 - 235 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $102.02 vs $130.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $0.48 vs $0.55 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT 6-Core, 12-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
