Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 42% better in Dota 2 than FX-8320 - 237 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $102.02 vs $349.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.61 vs $1.47 per FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |