Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Dragon Range | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket FL1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 85 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon 610M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
