Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900HX is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 221 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |