Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - 136 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $225.99 vs $495.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3950X - $1.67 vs $3.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3657 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |