Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K and the cheaper Core i7-10700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $225.94 vs $399.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $1.18 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 194 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
57%
Price, $
$399.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |