Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1478 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 317 vs 307 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $325.0 vs $352.36
- Up to 10% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.03 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
317
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$325
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
307
96.84542586750788%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
89.56521739130436%
Price, $
$352.36
92%
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
67.84268363215732%
Multi-Core
6726
67.05882352941175%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |