Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3158 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3930K - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $270.5 vs $325.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.87 vs $2.11 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 886 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
145
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |