Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 3234 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2620 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Cezanne | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
