Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800HS is 1946 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 181 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 7 4800HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
