Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4700U is 879 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 186 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4700U - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |