Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2864 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 42% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220 - 64 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
45
70.3125%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
29.86348122866894%
Multi-Core
1085
12.793302676571159%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |