Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 252 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $185.0 vs $269.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.68 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen 7 2700 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
70%
Price, $
$269
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |