Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 255 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 45% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $195.0 vs $352.36
- Up to 43% better value when playing War Thunder than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.2 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 1700X - 166 vs 162 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
162
97.59036144578313%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
56.60377358490566%
Price, $
$352.36
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2447 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1088
92.7536231884058%
Multi-Core
5574
82.87243532560214%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |