Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 580 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $195.0 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 1700X - 56 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75778 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75778 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1088
85.40031397174255%
Multi-Core
5574
74.77864233968339%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |