Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 606 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 195 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |