Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 90 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 245 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7782 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |