Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 258 days older than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 58 vs 56 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |