Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8300 - 246 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $106.06 vs $267.05
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $267.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76018 minutes ago
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |