Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - $100.0 vs $276.57
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 7 7700 - $0.79 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8300 - 149 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for $276.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |