Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than FX-6300 - 279 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $74.04 vs $82.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.29 vs $0.3 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $82.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5908 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |