Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1934 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-3210 - 202 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $70.0 vs $195.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.36 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |