Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1319 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 341 vs 338 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
341
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 90 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |