Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1050 days newer than Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2700K - 117 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 90 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |