Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $85.76 vs $708.81
- Up to 88% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.42 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 2600 - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
203
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
12%
Price, $
$708.81
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $708.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |