Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1577 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $106.47 vs $419.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900F - $0.5 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 2500X - 233 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
214
91.84549356223177%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32780 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
27.77777777777778%
Price, $
$419.95
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
40.4029304029304%
Multi-Core
3801
22.074452639526104%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |