Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 598 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $106.47 vs $225.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.31 vs $0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 360 vs 339 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
339
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4438 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |