Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2145 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2145 is 860 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2145 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2145 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2145
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 3 3250U - 707 vs 633 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon W-2145
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
