Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 1315 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 14% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 138 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |