Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3760 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-530 - 418 vs 366 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $45.0 vs $94.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.12 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |