Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $45.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 46% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400F - $0.26 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-530 - 209 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6772 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
54%
Price, $
$99.95
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |