Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 860 days older than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 2200U - 255 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |