Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 843 days newer than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 3 2200U - 313 vs 301 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
313
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |